Should the mortgage interest deduction go? And are politicians brave enough to cut it?

How brave would a politician have to be to vote in favor of cutting the home mortgage interest tax deduction?

Very, according to a new survey by the American Institute of Architects.

According to the survey, almost 70 percent of voters — that’s the key word here, “voters” not just people — say that this popular tax deduction should not be repealed as a way to help cut the country’s federal deficit.

Now, I love this tax deduction as much as the next homeowner. My home gives me enough grief throughout the year, what with leaky basements and shoddy plumbing. It’s nice to nab that big tax deduction each year.

But there is actually a pretty good reason to repeal this deduction: It’s a regressive tax, meaning that it benefits the wealthier more than it does those who are struggling financially.

Back in July, the Atlantic writer Matthew O’Brien outlined the case for repealing the tax deduction. As O’Brien writes, the richest taxpayers get a bigger deduction because they own bigger houses and are in a higher tax bracket.

According to the story, the United States loses $100 billion on this tax deduction every year.

That’s a lot of lost money. So ask yourself, are you willing to give up this deduction? And will you feel the same way in April of 2013?

(Of course, you probably don’t have to worry. Politicians may say they’re willing to make the tough choices — and cutting this deduction would certainly be a tough choice politically if not economically — but they certainly haven’t provided much evidence that they actually mean it.)

– Dan Rafter

About these ads
This entry was posted in national commercial real estate, residential real estate and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Should the mortgage interest deduction go? And are politicians brave enough to cut it?

  1. dennis deppisch says:

    A portion should go. Each taxpayer should be able to take the home mortgage interest deduction for 125% of the assessed value of their home based on the median value in each state. That way the residential real estate market should be able to avoid another crash. If the median assessed value in Illinois is $300,000, then the deduction would based prorata on $375,000. If a taxpayer’s assessment is $500,000, the taxpaper would be able to use 75% of the interest deduction. If its under $375,000 all of the deduction is used. By using the median income of each state, there is no disadvantage to someone in California or New York, because of the Illinois assessed values. Also the Second home deduction should be eliminated……dd

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s